Category Archives: Uncategorized

“Are We in a Civil War?”

 “Are We in a Civil War?”  April 15, 2018 – ACT For OHIO’s  National Security Briefing Sunday evening by Daniel Greenfield was, to be sure, a most succinct briefing on not only our current political and civic situation but Daniel also gave us an expeditious tour of the way we got in our current full-combat civilizational struggle against the forces of Islam, and its forward unit, the “Muslim Brotherhood.”

From Daniel’s web site, “Sultan Knish” we learned that he is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center… and a prolific blogger on Front Page Magazine’s blog, The Point … covering everything from Islamic terrorism in Argentina to leftist politics in America.”

Debbie Anderson fights Sharia in MN

February 25, 2018- Debbie Anderson was the speaker at ACT Cleveland’s meeting. Does Islam’s Sharia law conflict with America’s U.S. Constitution? Not sure? Debbie’s home state of Minnesota is just one state where that’s being put to the test. Understanding what is at stake is the key to dialogues within your communities.

Debbie gives credit to John,, (and his book “Raising a Jihadi Generation“) for teaching her how to dig deep into the Islamic communities where CAIR [Hamas] has made inroads into the political arena and threatens Americans’ first freedoms. (UTT offers training to law enforcement into the collective mind of the Muslim Brotherhood – a foreign insurgency and threat to democracy.)


Faith Leaders of America address “Interfaith Dialogues”

An open letter invitation to faith leaders of America, encouraging them to look closely at the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Interfaith Dialogue”initiative – also called “Bridge-building.

“Dear Colleague:

We are writing to invite you to join us in an important new initiative: Faith Leaders for America. 

As you surely know, the faith community in America has for many years been the focus of a patient, disciplined and increasingly successful effort to enlist its help in mainstreaming Islamic supremacist organizations and mosques in the name of “interfaith dialogue” and “bridge-building.”  

This initiative has long been a priority project of the Muslim Brotherhood.  One of the group’s top ideologues, Seyyid Qutb, explained the true purpose of such bridge-building in a highly influential handbook on incremental jihad entitled, Milestones: “The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah [the society of unbelievers] is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah may come over to Islam.”

In other words, Muslim Brotherhood operatives and their fellow Islamists engage in interfaith dialogue not as a genuine effort to foster tolerance and good-will among the followers of various religions.  Rather, it amounts to a one-way bridge, designed to facilitate Muslim proselytization and recruitment among those of other faiths.

The Islamic supremacists have been particularly successful of late in enlisting prominent Christian and Jewish clergy as partners in touting such memes as: “Islam is a religion of peace”; “Islam is a great Abrahamic faith”; “jihad is about personal struggle to be a better Muslim, not holy war”; and “Sharia is the same as Catholic canon law and Jewish halacha.” 

Perhaps most insidious of all is the role played by such non-Muslim clergy in endorsing the Islamists’ claim that America is awash with “Islamophobia” – a made-up condition that supposedly manifests as unreasoned, racist and bigoted fear of Muslims.  The practical, and ironic, effect is that these clerics are, thereby, actually facilitating the jihadists’ efforts to suppress our First Amendment’s protections of free speech and religious liberty.

Silencing opponents of the Islamic supremacists’ agenda often translates into still further accommodations to their demands.  Notably, this results in preferential treatment of Muslims and their faith in schools, offices and public spaces.  Examples include such symbolic acts of submission as: approval of separate and exclusive prayer rooms for Muslim worship and time off for those engaging in it; selective enforcement of dress codes; unique allowances for Islamic proselytization in curricula; the mandatory insinuation of halal meats into foods purveyed to Muslims and non-Muslims, alike; and the prohibition of the transportation, sale or consumption of pork, alcohol and other products deemed haram (impure) by Sharia-adherent Muslims.

We believe there is an urgent need for an interfaith group prepared to contest such subversive inroads into our religious life, communities and national fabric.  Our goal is to foster an honest dialogue about such topics as: the reality that, while Sharia may have a patina of religiosity, it is fundamentally a totalitarian political, military and legal doctrine; the historical – and ongoing – record of Islamic intolerance towards other faiths; and the unchecked ambitions of Islamic supremacists to achieve global domination through both genocidal jihad against “infidels,” mass migration (or colonization) and subversion in Western societies.

If you share our concerns and are willing to participate in an effort to foster authentic interfaith understanding and to protect our liberties, we ask that you become a member of Faith Leaders for America and assist us in enlisting other, like-minded clerics. 


Rabbi Jonathan Hausman 
Bishop E.W. Jackson

Dr. Rick Scarborough

Dr., Rev. Rick Joyner

Rev. Jerry A. Johnson

Pastor S.E. Broden

Pastor Paul Blair

Hon., Rev. Tony Barton

Dr. Stu Weber

Pastor Tom Hardiman

Rev. Lloyd C. Phillips

Deacon James R. Bacon

Minister Bart Peacher 

Pastor Justin Perry

Rev. Nancy G. Daniel

Pastor Roy L. Roden

Pastor Danny El Kouri

Rev. Matthew Jury

Dr. John Mallonee

Dr. Denton Mallonee

Deacon Gary R. Wickham

Minister Paul Allen

Minister LaVon Shapland

Rev. Dr. James A. Brettell

Rev. Buddy Fisher

Rev. John D. Boneck

Pastor Chuck Pifer

Senior Pastor Jerry Wickline

Pastor David White

Chaplain Gene Paul Nesgoda

Pastor Gary W. Haskell, Sr.

Pastor Marlin W. Sharp

Reverend Kenneth Mitchell

Robert Whitlow

Pastor Stephen Coran

Dr. William Enslow Jr.

Pastor David Whitney

Elder George Rasley

Pastor Dale Walker

Evangelist Dave Kistler

Pastor Ken Olson

Rev. John Peach

Bishop Keith Butler

Minister Steven Strzepek

Dr. Denton Mallonee

Pastor Mark Adolphsen

Pastor Bobby Sawyer

Radio Host Janet Mefferd

Rev. Vaughn Park

Rev. John Senin

Dr. Rick Patrick

Pastor John Pipp

Pastor Kenneth M. Fryer

Chaplain Hy McEnery

Rev. William McDonald, S.T.L., S.T.B.

Elder Raymond Grant

LTG (R), Rev. William G. “Jerry” Boykin

Bishop Aubrey Shines

Dr. Jim Garlow

Hon., Pastor Sam Rohrer

Bishop Robert D. Kee

Mr. David Barton

Pastor Walter B. Hoye II

Senior Pastor, Dr. Gary Dull

Rev. C.L. Bryant

Pastor Richard A. Samuels    

Pastor Mary Anne Hardiman

Rev. Donna Milham

Dr. Greg Linnebach   

Dr. Jorge E. Parrott

Rev. Sandy Durham

Minister Thomas Walz

Rev. William V. NeSmith

Senior Pastor Jack L. Smith

Pastor Isaac Crockett

Chaplain Gene C. Zeller

Rev. Cliff Willis

Rev. James McLaughlin

Minister Cynthia Dellatore Johnson

Minister Carole Hayes

Pastor Roger Burks

Rev., Pastor John Powell

Pastor Randy Strombeck

Pastor Shelly Pifer

Senior Pastor Ruth Wickline

Chaplain Debra Nesgoda

Pastor Ben Graham

Rev. M.L. Johnson

Pastor Brian Boyd

Maria Faber

Kathy Whitlow

Pastor Dilonna Coran

Pastor Todd A Johnson

Rev. John W. Butcher

Janet Ross

Hon. Rev. Jason Rapert

Rev. Keong Lai

Ruling Elder Abraham NuQuay

Pastor David McClellan

Senior Pastor Gus Booth

Pastor Ronnie Yarber

Bishop Harry R. Jackson, Jr.

Bishop Robert D. Kee

Dr. Richard Skinner

Rev. Barry Davis

Pastor Paul Caughill

Dr. Bruce Cook

Rev. Herman Pair

Pastor David Pitman

Rev. Joe Carey

Deacon Joseph Buccilli, PhD



Where you will find the tools you need…

Stopping the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan to Infiltrate America

Few Americans are aware of America’s largest terrorist prosecution in U.S. federal court, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation, et al. During the trial, in November of 2008, the government presented evidence that the Holy Land Foundation and five defendants provided approximately $12.4 million in support to Hamas and its goal of creating an Islamic Palestinian state by eliminating the State of Israel through violent jihad:

“In August of 2004, an alert Maryland Transportation Authority Police officer observed a woman wearing traditional Islamic garb videotaping the support structures of the Chesapeake Bay Bridge, and conducted a traffic stop. The driver was Ismail Elbarasse and detained on an outstanding material witness warrant issued in Chicago in connection with fundraising for Hamas. The FBI’s Washington Field Office subsequently executed a search warrant on Elbarasse’s residence in Annandale, Virginia. In the basement of his home, a hidden sub-basement was found; it revealed over 80 banker boxes of the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America.” One of the most important of these documents made public to date was entered into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation trial. It amounted to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Plan in America and was entitled, “An Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America.”

From the archives of the Muslim Brotherhood in America, the innocuous-sounding “Explanatory Memorandum” explained how the Muslim Brotherhood sought to extend sharia into the United States and Canada. Another document referenced from the U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation trial was an undated paper titled “Phases of the World Underground Movement Plan.” It specified the five phases of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement in North America.

Phase One: Phase of discreet and secret establishment of leadership.

Phase Two: Phase of gradual appearance on the public scene and exercising and utilizing various public activities. Establishing a shadow government (secret) within the Government.

On October 30, 2008, candidate Barack Obama famously exclaimed, “We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” Candidate Obama gave specific guidance for staffing his administration, captured in an email from September 2008, advisers would choose Arab Muslims over Arab Christians for the top jobs.

While the Obama transition team aimed to hire Muslims “for the top jobs,” President Obama directed his cabinet and political appointees to develop and implement “Muslim Outreach” programs. He told NASA administrator Charles Bolden that his highest priority should be “to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science… and math and engineering.” President Obama announced plans for the first ever federally funded Muslim outreach program. The program would be available nationwide for all elementary school students grade K-12. The program was designed to educate children about the fundamentals of the Muslim religion and Islamic belief. When CIA Director John Panetta visited Dearborn, Michigan he too was complying with the directives of President Obama. Panetta articulated he wanted to boost CIA recruitment efforts in Arab and Muslim communities.

With the election of President Obama in November 2008 and his Muslim Outreach initiative, exemplified by his Cairo “A New Beginnings Speech” at al Azhar University, the Obama administration officially extended a welcome to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Investor’s Business Daily provided a chronology of events, “How the CIA Helped the Muslim Brotherhood Infiltrate the West.” The Muslim Brotherhood’s star was rising and became a partner in the Obama White House. The crown jewel of Muslim Brotherhood influence was the fall of the Mubarak regime in Egypt during the Arab Spring of 2011. The White House fully supported the Muslim Brotherhood candidate, Mohamad Morsi, for president.

Another cabinet member, Secretary Hillary Clinton, stressed her belief that “we must increase outreach not simply to American Muslims, but to Muslims around the world.” Secretary Clinton’s right-hand aide, Huma Abedin, may have been the go-to person for the State Department’s “Muslim outreach” programs. It is noteworthy that Huma Abedin and her family have strong ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and promoted a hardline Islamic ideology. For 12 years, Huma Abedin, edited a radical Muslim publication that blamed the U.S. for September 11, 2001. Syed Abedin, Huma’s father, outlined his Muslim Brotherhood view of sharia law and how the Western world has turned Muslims “hostile.”

During her tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton and her minions found ways to remove sensitive and highly classified information from State Department offices. The public became aware that Secretary Clinton eschewed the State Department’s classified and unclassified email systems for a private “homebrew” and off-site email server. When Mrs. Clinton stepped down from her post, she was likely under investigation by the FBI for her role in the Clinton Foundation, along with espionage, and the destruction of her official records and emails.

FBI Director Comey held a press conference on July 5, 2016. “We did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

There were a substantial number of members of Congress and the intelligence community that Hillary Clinton should have been charged for violating the Espionage Act of 1917. During the third presidential debate nominee Trump announced the Clinton Foundation was “a criminal enterprise” and “She shouldn’t be allowed to run. It’s — she’s guilty of a very, very serious crime.”

Whether there is intent to harm the United States or not, the essence of espionage is to remove classified documents out of a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a SCIF, and put them into the hands of “someone not authorized to receive them.” While there were over a thousand secret or higher classified documents on her private server, Mrs. Clinton disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 33,000 emails that she deemed “personal.” When Mrs. Clinton stepped down from her position, Huma Abedin was allowed to take five boxes of “physical files” out of the State Department that include records described as “Muslim Engagement Documents.”

The history of the Obama administration is one rife with connections to or with the Muslim Brotherhood and the preferential hiring of Muslims “for the top job.” Some WikiLeaks emails describe that sensitive and top-level government positions were to be filled by Muslims. Would they have questionable loyalties to the United States? After the disgraced David Petraeus was removed from his position as CIA Director, one of the FBI’s former top experts on Islam announced that President Obama’s pick to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, had converted to Islam years ago. Apparently, everyone in Washington knew it but it was never reported. John Brennan was full of surprises after becoming CIA Director. During an interview, John Brennan clearly stated that he voted for the Communist Party candidate, Gus Hall, for President of the United States.

What was in Hillary Clinton’s 33,000 emails? Correspondence with Barack Obama under an alias? Correspondence with Clinton Foundation members and donors? Correspondence with Vladimir Putin or other Russian politicians? My money is on correspondence with the Muslim Brotherhood. The assured election of Hillary Clinton was to be the third term of Barack Obama, as Barack Obama and his minions worked tirelessly to fulfill the dictates of the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategic plan to infiltrate the American government. What is more “fundamentally transforming” for the United States than an open-door policy for the immigration of Muslims, or the infiltration of Muslims in the government? Also remember, Barack Obama also reversed President Bush’s policy and removed the FBI from conducting surveillance on mosques.

Once Donald Trump was elected, was it reasonable to expect that all of Obama’s strategic work to “transform the United States of America” through “Muslim outreach” or “Muslim engagement” programs as well as to facilitate the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy of phased infiltration of Muslims into government would be systematically undone through a complete rejection and reversal of President Obama’s policies?

Isn’t that what we are seeing today?